chromium/mojo/public/tools/fuzzers/mojolpm.proto

// Copyright 2019 The Chromium Authors
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
// found in the LICENSE file.

syntax = "proto2";

package mojolpm;

// TODO(markbrand): Is there anything sensible to do to fuzz interfaces that
// use or expect a generic mojo handle?
message Handle {}

message CreateDataPipeOptions {
  required uint32 flags = 2;
  required uint32 element_num_bytes = 3;
  required uint32 capacity_num_bytes = 4;
}

message CreateSharedBufferOptions {
  required uint64 num_bytes = 2;
}

message DataPipeConsumerHandle {
  oneof instance {
    uint32 old = 1;
    CreateDataPipeOptions new = 2;
  }
}

message DataPipeProducerHandle {
  oneof instance {
    uint32 old = 1;
    CreateDataPipeOptions new = 2;
  }
}

message DataPipeRead {
  required DataPipeConsumerHandle handle = 1;
  required uint32 size = 2;
}

message DataPipeWrite {
  required DataPipeProducerHandle handle = 1;
  required bytes data = 2;
}

message DataPipeConsumerClose {
  required uint32 id = 1;
}

message DataPipeProducerClose {
  required uint32 id = 1;
}

message SharedBufferHandle {
  oneof instance {
    uint32 old = 1;
    CreateSharedBufferOptions new = 2;
  }
}

message SharedBufferWrite {
  required SharedBufferHandle handle = 1;
  required bytes data = 2;
}

message SharedBufferRelease {
  required uint32 id = 1;
}

// TODO(markbrand): Implement these last two.
message MessagePipeHandle {}

message PlatformHandle {}