scope-specificity.html | Explore in Territory

<!DOCTYPE html>
<title>@scope - specificity</title>
<link rel="help" href="https://drafts.csswg.org/css-cascade-6/#scope-atrule">
<script src="/resources/testharness.js"></script>
<script src="/resources/testharnessreport.js"></script>
<style id=style>
</style>
<main id=main>
  <style id=styleImplicit></style>
  <div id=a class=a>
    <div id=b class=b>
    </div>
  </div>
</main>
<script>

// Format a scoped style rule using the selector at scoped_selector's last element,
// with each preceding array item representing an enclosing @scope rule.
//
// Example:
//
//  scoped_selector=['@scope (foo)', '@scope (bar)', 'div']
//  declarations='z-index:42'
//    => '@scope (foo) { @scope (bar) { div { z-index:42 } } }'
function format_scoped_rule(scoped_selector, declarations) {
  if (scoped_selector.length < 2) {
    throw "Fail";
  }
  let scope_prelude = scoped_selector[0];
  let remainder = scoped_selector.slice(1);
  let content = remainder.length == 1
                  ? `${remainder[0]} { ${declarations} }`
                  : format_scoped_rule(remainder, declarations);
  return `${scope_prelude} { ${content} }`;
}

// Verify that the specificity of 'scoped_selector' is the same
// as the specificity of 'ref_selector'. Both selectors must select
// an element within #main.
function test_scope_specificity(scoped_selector, ref_selector, style) {
  if (style === undefined) {
    style = document.getElementById("style");
  }
  test(t => {
    t.add_cleanup(() => { style.textContent = ''; });

    let element = main.querySelector(ref_selector);
    assert_not_equals(element, null);

    let scoped_rule = format_scoped_rule(scoped_selector, 'z-index:1');
    let ref_rule = `:is(${ref_selector}) { z-index:2 }`;

    style.textContent = `${scoped_rule}`;
    assert_equals(getComputedStyle(element).zIndex, '1', 'scoped rule');

    style.textContent = `${ref_rule}`;
    assert_equals(getComputedStyle(element).zIndex, '2', 'unscoped rule');

    // The scoped rule should win due to proximity.
    style.textContent = `${scoped_rule} ${ref_rule}`;
    assert_equals(getComputedStyle(element).zIndex, '1', 'scoped + unscoped');

    // The scoped rule should win due to proximity (reverse).
    style.textContent = `${ref_rule} ${scoped_rule}`;
    assert_equals(getComputedStyle(element).zIndex, '1', 'unscoped + scoped');

    // Add one (1) to the specificty of the unscoped rule. This should
    // cause the unscoped rule to win instead.
    style.textContent = `div${ref_rule} ${scoped_rule}`;
    assert_equals(getComputedStyle(element).zIndex, '2', 'unscoped + scoped');
  }, format_scoped_rule(scoped_selector, '') + ' and ' + ref_selector);
}

// Selectors within @scope implicitly have `:scope <descendant-combinator>`
// added, but no specificity associated with it is added.
// See https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10196
test_scope_specificity(['@scope (#main)', '.b'], '.b');
test_scope_specificity(['@scope (#main) to (.b)', '.a'], '.a');
test_scope_specificity(['@scope (#main, .foo, .bar)', '#a'], '#a');
test_scope_specificity(['@scope (#main)', 'div.b'], 'div.b');
test_scope_specificity(['@scope (#main)', ':scope .b'], '.a .b');
// Inherit the specificity of the scope-start selector.
test_scope_specificity(['@scope (#main)', '& .b'], '#main .b');
test_scope_specificity(['@scope (#main)', 'div .b'], 'div .b');
test_scope_specificity(['@scope (#main)', '@scope (.a)', '.b'], '.b');
// Explicit `:scope` adds specficity.
test_scope_specificity(['@scope (#main)', ':scope .b'], ':scope .b');
// Using & in scoped style with implicit scope root uses `:scope`, which adds specificity
test_scope_specificity(['@scope', '& .b'], ':scope .b', styleImplicit);
// Using relative selector syntax does not add specificity
test_scope_specificity(['@scope (#main)', '> .a'], ':where(#main) > .a');
</script>
chromium/third_party/blink/web_tests/external/wpt/css/css-cascade/scope-specificity.html
