# RUN: %PYTHON %s
# It is sufficient that this doesn't assert.
from mlir.ir import *
def createDetachedModule():
module = Module.create()
with InsertionPoint(module.body):
# TODO: Python bindings are currently unaware that modules are also
# operations, so having a module erased won't trigger the cascading
# removal of live operations (#93337). Use a non-module operation
# instead.
nested = Operation.create("test.some_operation", regions=1)
# When the operation is detached from parent, it is considered to be
# owned by Python. It will therefore be erased when the Python object
# is destroyed.
nested.detach_from_parent()
# However, we create and maintain references to operations within
# `nested`. These references keep the corresponding operations in the
# "live" list even if they have been erased in C++, making them
# "zombie". If the C++ allocator reuses one of the address previously
# used for a now-"zombie" operation, this used to result in an
# assertion "cannot create detached operation that already exists" from
# the bindings code. Erasing the detached operation should result in
# removing all nested operations from the live list.
#
# Note that the assertion is not guaranteed since it depends on the
# behavior of the allocator on the C++ side, so this test mail fail
# intermittently.
with InsertionPoint(nested.regions[0].blocks.append()):
a = [Operation.create("test.some_other_operation") for i in range(100)]
return a
def createManyDetachedModules():
with Context() as ctx, Location.unknown():
ctx.allow_unregistered_dialects = True
for j in range(100):
a = createDetachedModule()
if __name__ == "__main__":
createManyDetachedModules()