// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wunused-value %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wunused-value -std=c++98 %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wunused-value -std=c++11 %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wunused-value -std=c++17 %s
// PR4806
namespace test0 {
class Box {
public:
int i;
volatile int j;
};
void doit() {
// pointer to volatile has side effect (thus no warning)
Box* box = new Box;
box->i; // expected-warning {{expression result unused}}
box->j;
#if __cplusplus <= 199711L
// expected-warning@-2 {{expression result unused}}
#endif
}
}
namespace test1 {
struct Foo {
int i;
bool operator==(const Foo& rhs) {
return i == rhs.i;
}
};
#define NOP(x) (x)
void b(Foo f1, Foo f2) {
NOP(f1 == f2); // expected-warning {{expression result unused}}
}
#undef NOP
}
namespace test2 {
extern "C++" {
namespace std {
template<typename T> struct basic_string {
struct X {};
void method() const {
X* x;
&x[0]; // expected-warning {{expression result unused}}
}
};
typedef basic_string<char> string;
void func(const std::string& str) {
str.method(); // expected-note {{in instantiation of member function}}
}
}
}
}
namespace test3 {
struct Used {
Used();
Used(int);
Used(int, int);
~Used() {}
};
struct __attribute__((warn_unused)) Unused {
Unused();
Unused(int);
Unused(int, int);
~Unused() {}
};
void f() {
Used();
Used(1);
Used(1, 1);
Unused(); // expected-warning {{expression result unused}}
Unused(1); // expected-warning {{expression result unused}}
Unused(1, 1); // expected-warning {{expression result unused}}
#if __cplusplus >= 201103L // C++11 or later
Used({});
Unused({}); // expected-warning {{expression result unused}}
#endif
}
}
namespace std {
struct type_info {};
}
namespace test4 {
struct Good { Good &f(); };
struct Bad { virtual Bad& f(); };
void f() {
int i = 0;
(void)typeid(++i); // expected-warning {{expression with side effects has no effect in an unevaluated context}}
Good g;
(void)typeid(g.f()); // Ok; not a polymorphic use of a glvalue.
// This is a polymorphic use of a glvalue, which results in the typeid being
// evaluated instead of unevaluated.
Bad b;
(void)typeid(b.f()); // expected-warning {{expression with side effects will be evaluated despite being used as an operand to 'typeid'}}
extern Bad * pb;
// This typeid can throw but that is not a side-effect that we care about
// warning for since this is idiomatic code
(void)typeid(*pb);
(void)sizeof(typeid(*pb));
(void)typeid(*++pb); // expected-warning {{expression with side effects will be evaluated despite being used as an operand to 'typeid'}}
(void)sizeof(typeid(*++pb)); // expected-warning {{expression with side effects has no effect in an unevaluated context}}
// FIXME: we should not warn about this in an unevaluated context
// expected-warning@-2 {{expression with side effects will be evaluated despite being used as an operand to 'typeid'}}
// A dereference of a volatile pointer is a side effecting operation, however
// since it is idiomatic code, and the alternatives induce higher maintenance
// costs, it is allowed.
int * volatile x;
(void)sizeof(*x); // Ok
}
}
static volatile char var1 = 'a';
volatile char var2 = 'a';
static volatile char arr1[] = "hello";
volatile char arr2[] = "hello";
void volatile_array() {
static volatile char var3 = 'a';
volatile char var4 = 'a';
static volatile char arr3[] = "hello";
volatile char arr4[] = "hello";
// These all result in volatile loads in C and C++11. In C++98, they don't,
// but we suppress the warning in the case where '(void)var;' might be
// idiomatically suppressing an 'unused variable' warning.
(void)var1;
(void)var2;
#if __cplusplus < 201103L
// expected-warning@-2 {{expression result unused; assign into a variable to force a volatile load}}
#endif
(void)var3;
(void)var4;
// None of these result in volatile loads in any language mode, and it's not
// really reasonable to assume that they would, since volatile array loads
// don't really exist anywhere.
(void)arr1;
(void)arr2;
(void)arr3;
(void)arr4;
}
#if __cplusplus >= 201103L // C++11 or later
namespace test5 {
int v[(5, 6)]; // expected-warning {{left operand of comma operator has no effect}}
void foo() {
new double[false ? (1, 2) : 3]
// FIXME: We shouldn't diagnose the unreachable constant expression
// here.
[false ? (1, 2) : 3]; // expected-warning {{left operand of comma operator has no effect}}
}
} // namespace test5
// comma operator diagnostics should be suppressed in a SFINAE context.
template <typename T, int = (T{},0)> int c(int) { return 0; }
template <typename T, int> int c(double) { return 1; }
int foo() { return c<int>(0); }
#endif
#if __cplusplus >= 201703L // C++17 or later
namespace test6 {
auto b() {
if constexpr (false)
return (1,0);
else
return (1.0,0.0); // expected-warning {{left operand of comma operator has no effect}}
}
} // namespace test6
#endif