============
Debug Checks
============
.. contents::
:local:
The analyzer contains a number of checkers which can aid in debugging. Enable
them by using the "-analyzer-checker=" flag, followed by the name of the
checker.
General Analysis Dumpers
========================
These checkers are used to dump the results of various infrastructural analyses
to stderr. Some checkers also have "view" variants, which will display a graph
using a 'dot' format viewer (such as Graphviz on macOS) instead.
- debug.DumpCallGraph, debug.ViewCallGraph: Show the call graph generated for
the current translation unit. This is used to determine the order in which to
analyze functions when inlining is enabled.
- debug.DumpCFG, debug.ViewCFG: Show the CFG generated for each top-level
function being analyzed.
- debug.DumpDominators: Shows the dominance tree for the CFG of each top-level
function.
- debug.DumpLiveVars: Show the results of live variable analysis for each
top-level function being analyzed.
- debug.DumpLiveExprs: Show the results of live expression analysis for each
top-level function being analyzed.
- debug.ViewExplodedGraph: Show the Exploded Graphs generated for the
analysis of different functions in the input translation unit. When there
are several functions analyzed, display one graph per function. Beware
that these graphs may grow very large, even for small functions.
Path Tracking
=============
These checkers print information about the path taken by the analyzer engine.
- debug.DumpCalls: Prints out every function or method call encountered during a
path traversal. This is indented to show the call stack, but does NOT do any
special handling of branches, meaning different paths could end up
interleaved.
- debug.DumpTraversal: Prints the name of each branch statement encountered
during a path traversal ("IfStmt", "WhileStmt", etc). Currently used to check
whether the analysis engine is doing BFS or DFS.
State Checking
==============
These checkers will print out information about the analyzer state in the form
of analysis warnings. They are intended for use with the -verify functionality
in regression tests.
- debug.TaintTest: Prints out the word "tainted" for every expression that
carries taint. At the time of this writing, taint was only introduced by the
checks under experimental.security.taint.TaintPropagation; this checker may
eventually move to the security.taint package.
- debug.ExprInspection: Responds to certain function calls, which are modeled
after builtins. These function calls should affect the program state other
than the evaluation of their arguments; to use them, you will need to declare
them within your test file. The available functions are described below.
(FIXME: debug.ExprInspection should probably be renamed, since it no longer only
inspects expressions.)
ExprInspection checks
---------------------
- ``void clang_analyzer_eval(bool);``
Prints TRUE if the argument is known to have a non-zero value, FALSE if the
argument is known to have a zero or null value, and UNKNOWN if the argument
isn't sufficiently constrained on this path. You can use this to test other
values by using expressions like "x == 5". Note that this functionality is
currently DISABLED in inlined functions, since different calls to the same
inlined function could provide different information, making it difficult to
write proper -verify directives.
In C, the argument can be typed as 'int' or as '_Bool'.
Example usage::
clang_analyzer_eval(x); // expected-warning{{UNKNOWN}}
if (!x) return;
clang_analyzer_eval(x); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
- ``void clang_analyzer_checkInlined(bool);``
If a call occurs within an inlined function, prints TRUE or FALSE according to
the value of its argument. If a call occurs outside an inlined function,
nothing is printed.
The intended use of this checker is to assert that a function is inlined at
least once (by passing 'true' and expecting a warning), or to assert that a
function is never inlined (by passing 'false' and expecting no warning). The
argument is technically unnecessary but is intended to clarify intent.
You might wonder why we can't print TRUE if a function is ever inlined and
FALSE if it is not. The problem is that any inlined function could conceivably
also be analyzed as a top-level function (in which case both TRUE and FALSE
would be printed), depending on the value of the -analyzer-inlining option.
In C, the argument can be typed as 'int' or as '_Bool'.
Example usage::
int inlined() {
clang_analyzer_checkInlined(true); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
return 42;
}
void topLevel() {
clang_analyzer_checkInlined(false); // no-warning (not inlined)
int value = inlined();
// This assertion will not be valid if the previous call was not inlined.
clang_analyzer_eval(value == 42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
}
- ``void clang_analyzer_warnIfReached();``
Generate a warning if this line of code gets reached by the analyzer.
Example usage::
if (true) {
clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // expected-warning{{REACHABLE}}
}
else {
clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // no-warning
}
- ``void clang_analyzer_numTimesReached();``
Same as above, but include the number of times this call expression
gets reached by the analyzer during the current analysis.
Example usage::
for (int x = 0; x < 3; ++x) {
clang_analyzer_numTimesReached(); // expected-warning{{3}}
}
- ``void clang_analyzer_warnOnDeadSymbol(int);``
Subscribe for a delayed warning when the symbol that represents the value of
the argument is garbage-collected by the analyzer.
When calling 'clang_analyzer_warnOnDeadSymbol(x)', if value of 'x' is a
symbol, then this symbol is marked by the ExprInspection checker. Then,
during each garbage collection run, the checker sees if the marked symbol is
being collected and issues the 'SYMBOL DEAD' warning if it does.
This way you know where exactly, up to the line of code, the symbol dies.
It is unlikely that you call this function after the symbol is already dead,
because the very reference to it as the function argument prevents it from
dying. However, if the argument is not a symbol but a concrete value,
no warning would be issued.
Example usage::
do {
int x = generate_some_integer();
clang_analyzer_warnOnDeadSymbol(x);
} while(0); // expected-warning{{SYMBOL DEAD}}
- ``void clang_analyzer_explain(a single argument of any type);``
This function explains the value of its argument in a human-readable manner
in the warning message. You can make as many overrides of its prototype
in the test code as necessary to explain various integral, pointer,
or even record-type values. To simplify usage in C code (where overloading
the function declaration is not allowed), you may append an arbitrary suffix
to the function name, without affecting functionality.
Example usage::
void clang_analyzer_explain(int);
void clang_analyzer_explain(void *);
// Useful in C code
void clang_analyzer_explain_int(int);
void foo(int param, void *ptr) {
clang_analyzer_explain(param); // expected-warning{{argument 'param'}}
clang_analyzer_explain_int(param); // expected-warning{{argument 'param'}}
if (!ptr)
clang_analyzer_explain(ptr); // expected-warning{{memory address '0'}}
}
- ``void clang_analyzer_dump( /* a single argument of any type */);``
Similar to clang_analyzer_explain, but produces a raw dump of the value,
same as SVal::dump().
Example usage::
void clang_analyzer_dump(int);
void foo(int x) {
clang_analyzer_dump(x); // expected-warning{{reg_$0<x>}}
}
- ``size_t clang_analyzer_getExtent(void *);``
This function returns the value that represents the extent of a memory region
pointed to by the argument. This value is often difficult to obtain otherwise,
because no valid code that produces this value. However, it may be useful
for testing purposes, to see how well does the analyzer model region extents.
Example usage::
void foo() {
int x, *y;
size_t xs = clang_analyzer_getExtent(&x);
clang_analyzer_explain(xs); // expected-warning{{'4'}}
size_t ys = clang_analyzer_getExtent(&y);
clang_analyzer_explain(ys); // expected-warning{{'8'}}
}
- ``void clang_analyzer_printState();``
Dumps the current ProgramState to the stderr. Quickly lookup the program state
at any execution point without ViewExplodedGraph or re-compiling the program.
This is not very useful for writing tests (apart from testing how ProgramState
gets printed), but useful for debugging tests. Also, this method doesn't
produce a warning, so it gets printed on the console before all other
ExprInspection warnings.
Example usage::
void foo() {
int x = 1;
clang_analyzer_printState(); // Read the stderr!
}
- ``void clang_analyzer_hashDump(int);``
The analyzer can generate a hash to identify reports. To debug what information
is used to calculate this hash it is possible to dump the hashed string as a
warning of an arbitrary expression using the function above.
Example usage::
void foo() {
int x = 1;
clang_analyzer_hashDump(x); // expected-warning{{hashed string for x}}
}
- ``void clang_analyzer_denote(int, const char *);``
Denotes symbols with strings. A subsequent call to clang_analyzer_express()
will expresses another symbol in terms of these string. Useful for testing
relationships between different symbols.
Example usage::
void foo(int x) {
clang_analyzer_denote(x, "$x");
clang_analyzer_express(x + 1); // expected-warning{{$x + 1}}
}
- ``void clang_analyzer_express(int);``
See clang_analyzer_denote().
- ``void clang_analyzer_isTainted(a single argument of any type);``
Queries the analyzer whether the expression used as argument is tainted or not.
This is useful in tests, where we don't want to issue warning for all tainted
expressions but only check for certain expressions.
This would help to reduce the *noise* that the `TaintTest` debug checker would
introduce and let you focus on the `expected-warning`'s that you really care
about.
Example usage::
int read_integer() {
int n;
clang_analyzer_isTainted(n); // expected-warning{{NO}}
scanf("%d", &n);
clang_analyzer_isTainted(n); // expected-warning{{YES}}
clang_analyzer_isTainted(n + 2); // expected-warning{{YES}}
clang_analyzer_isTainted(n > 0); // expected-warning{{YES}}
int next_tainted_value = n; // no-warning
return n;
}
- ``clang_analyzer_dumpExtent(a single argument of any type)``
- ``clang_analyzer_dumpElementCount(a single argument of any type)``
Dumps out the extent and the element count of the argument.
Example usage::
void array() {
int a[] = {1, 3};
clang_analyzer_dumpExtent(a); // expected-warning {{8 S64b}}
clang_analyzer_dumpElementCount(a); // expected-warning {{2 S64b}}
}
- ``clang_analyzer_value(a single argument of integer or pointer type)``
Prints an associated value for the given argument.
Supported argument types are integers, enums and pointers.
The value can be represented either as a range set or as a concrete integer.
For the rest of the types function prints ``n/a`` (aka not available).
**Note:** This function will print nothing for clang built with Z3 constraint manager.
This may cause crashes of your tests. To manage this use one of the test constraining
techniques:
* llvm-lit commands ``REQUIRES no-z3`` or ``UNSUPPORTED z3`` `See for details. <https://llvm.org/docs/TestingGuide.html#constraining-test-execution>`_
* a preprocessor directive ``#ifndef ANALYZER_CM_Z3``
* a clang command argument ``-analyzer-constraints=range``
Example usage::
void print(char c, unsigned u) {
clang_analyzer_value(c); // expected-warning {{8s:{ [-128, 127] }}}
if(u != 42)
clang_analyzer_value(u); // expected-warning {{32u:{ [0, 41], [43, 4294967295] }}}
else
clang_analyzer_value(u); // expected-warning {{32u:42}}
}
Statistics
==========
The debug.Stats checker collects various information about the analysis of each
function, such as how many blocks were reached and if the analyzer timed out.
There is also an additional -analyzer-stats flag, which enables various
statistics within the analyzer engine. Note the Stats checker (which produces at
least one bug report per function) may actually change the values reported by
-analyzer-stats.
Output testing checkers
=======================
- debug.ReportStmts reports a warning at **every** statement, making it a very
useful tool for testing thoroughly bug report construction and output
emission.
Codebase Browser
llvm