Contributing
============
Getting Started
---------------
Please refer to the `LLVM Getting Started Guide
<https://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html>`_ for general information on how to
get started on the LLVM project. A detailed explanation on how to build and
test LLDB can be found in the `build instructions <build.html>`_ and `test
instructions <test.html>`_ respectively.
Contributing to LLDB
--------------------
Please refer to the `LLVM Developer Policy
<https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html>`_ for information about
authoring and uploading a patch. LLDB differs from the LLVM Developer
Policy in the following respects.
For anything not explicitly listed here, assume that LLDB follows the LLVM
policy.
Coding Style
++++++++++++
LLDB's code style differs from `LLVM's coding style <https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html>`_
in a few ways. The 2 main ones are:
* `Variable and function naming <https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#name-types-functions-variables-and-enumerators-properly>`_:
* Variables are ``snake_case``.
* Functions and methods are ``UpperCamelCase``.
* Static, global and member variables have ``s_``, ``g_`` and ``m_``
prefixes respectively.
* `Use of asserts <https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#assert-liberally>`_:
See the :ref:`section below<Error Handling>`.
For any other contradications, consider the
`golden rule <https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#introduction>`_
before choosing to update the style of existing code.
All new code in LLDB should be formatted with clang-format. Existing code may
not conform and should be updated prior to being modified. Bulk reformatting
is discouraged.
Test Infrastructure
+++++++++++++++++++
Like LLVM it is important to submit tests with your patches, but note that a
subset of LLDB tests (the API tests) use a different system. Refer to the
`test documentation <test.html>`_ for more details and the
`lldb/test <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/tree/main/lldb/test>`_ folder
for examples.
.. _Error handling:
Error handling and use of assertions in LLDB
--------------------------------------------
Contrary to Clang, which is typically a short-lived process, LLDB
debuggers stay up and running for a long time, often serving multiple
debug sessions initiated by an IDE. For this reason LLDB code needs to
be extra thoughtful about how to handle errors. Below are a couple
rules of thumb:
* Invalid input. To deal with invalid input, such as malformed DWARF,
missing object files, or otherwise inconsistent debug info,
error handling types such as `llvm::Expected<T>
<https://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1Expected.html>`_ or
``std::optional<T>`` should be used. Functions that may fail
should return their result using these wrapper types instead of
using a bool to indicate success. Returning a default value when an
error occurred is also discouraged.
* Assertions. Assertions (from ``assert.h``) should be used liberally
to assert internal consistency. Assertions shall **never** be
used to detect invalid user input, such as malformed DWARF. An
assertion should be placed to assert invariants that the developer
is convinced will always hold, regardless what an end-user does with
LLDB. Because assertions are not present in release builds, the
checks in an assertion may be more expensive than otherwise
permissible. In combination with the LLDB test suite, assertions are
what allows us to refactor and evolve the LLDB code base.
* Logging. LLDB provides a very rich logging API. When recoverable
errors cannot reasonably be surfaced to the end user, the error may
be written to a topical log channel.
* Soft assertions. LLDB provides ``lldbassert()`` as a soft
alternative to cover the middle ground of situations that indicate a
recoverable bug in LLDB. When asserts are enabled ``lldbassert()``
behaves like ``assert()``. When asserts are disabled, it will print a
warning and encourage the user to file a bug report, similar to
LLVM's crash handler, and then return execution. Use these sparingly
and only if error handling is not otherwise feasible.
.. note::
New code should not be using ``lldbassert()`` and existing uses should
be replaced by other means of error handling.
* Fatal errors. Aborting LLDB's process using
``llvm::report_fatal_error()`` or ``abort()`` should be avoided at all
costs. It's acceptable to use ``llvm_unreachable()`` for actually
unreachable code such as the default in an otherwise exhaustive
switch statement.
Overall, please keep in mind that the debugger is often used as a last
resort, and a crash in the debugger is rarely appreciated by the
end-user.
Codebase Browser
llvm