// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fcxx-exceptions -fexceptions -fsyntax-only -verify %s
class BaseEx {};
class Ex1: public BaseEx {};
typedef Ex1 Ex2;
void f();
void test()
try {}
catch (BaseEx &e) { f(); } // expected-note 2{{for type 'BaseEx &'}}
catch (Ex1 &e) { f(); } // expected-warning {{exception of type 'Ex1 &' will be caught by earlier handler}} \
expected-note {{for type 'Ex1 &'}}
// FIXME: It would be nicer to only issue one warning on the below line instead
// of two. We get two diagnostics because the first one is noticing that there
// is a class hierarchy inversion where the earlier base class handler will
// catch throwing the derived class and the second one is because Ex2 and Ex1
// are the same type after canonicalization.
catch (Ex2 &e) { f(); } // expected-warning 2{{exception of type 'Ex2 &' (aka 'Ex1 &') will be caught by earlier handler}}
namespace GH61177 {
void func() {
const char arr[4] = "abc";
// We should not issue an "exception will be caught by earlier handler"
// diagnostic, as that is a lie.
try {
throw arr;
} catch (char *p) {
} catch (const char *p) {
}
}
} // GH61177