<!--===- docs/DesignGuideline.md
Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
-->
# Design Guideline
```{contents}
---
local:
---
```
## Documenting the design
### Designing support for a new feature
When working on a new feature in flang, some design document should
be produced before submitting patches to the code. Note that new features
that need support in flang are listed in llvm github project
[Flang features to be implemented](https://github.com/orgs/llvm/projects/12).
The preferred organization of such documents is:
1) Problem description
2) Proposed solution
3) Implementation details overview
4) Testing plan
If several solutions can be considered, it is best to briefly describe the
alternate solutions in 2) and why they were not retained.
The design document should be added to the `docs` folder as a markdown document,
ideally using the name of the feature as the document name. Its approval on
Phabricator is the pre-requisite to submitting patches implementing new
features.
An RFC on flang https://discourse.llvm.org can first be made as one sees fit,
but this document should still be produced to summarize, organize, and formalize
the discussions. If a related discourse RFC was made it is a good idea to give a
link to it in the document for future reference. If no RFC was made before
sending the design document for review, it is highly encouraged to make a small
announcement on https://discourse.llvm.org with a link to the Phabricator
design document review.
The Testing Plan should briefly describe what aspects will be tested with LLVM
unit test tools (see
[LLVM Testing Guide](https://llvm.org/docs/TestingGuide.html)), and if some
existing end-to-end test suite or application can be used to validate the
feature implementation.
Features impacting projects outside of flang (like work OpenMP or OpenACC that
may require touching parts outside of flang tree) should follow [the general
LLVM process](https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#making-a-major-change),
or the related subproject process. There should still be a related flang design
document if part of the solution impacts flang in significant ways (e.g. if the
changes in the code that lowers the parse-tree to OpenMP and FIR dialects are
not straightforwardly mapping parse-tree nodes to dialect operations).
### Updating the implementation solution of a feature
When doing a significant change to the implementation solution for a feature,
the related design document should be updated so that it will justify the new
solution.
## Design tips
### Design document style
The document does not have to be long. It is highly encouraged to:
- Stick to well-defined Fortran terms when talking about Fortran
(definitions of these terms can be found in Section 3 of Fortran 2018
standard).
- Be precise (e.g., pointing to the standard reference or constraint numbers).
References should currently be given against the Fortran 2018 standard
version.
- Illustrate with a few small Fortran code snippets if applicable
- When dealing with lowering, illustrate lowering output with a few FIR
and LLVM IR code snippets.
- Illustrations do not have to be fully functional programs, it is better to
keep them small and focused on the feature. More detailed expectations
can be added in a second time or in parallel as LIT tests for example.
### Thinking through the design of a Fortran feature
Below is a set of suggested steps that one can take to fully apprehend a
Fortran feature before writing a design for its implementation in flang.
- Identify the relevant sections and constraints in the standard.
- Write Fortran programs using the feature and, if possible,
verify your expectations with existing compilers.
- Check if the related constraints (Cxxx numbers in the standard) are enforced
by semantic checks in the compiler. If not, it is a good idea to start by
adding the related checks (this does not require writing a design document).
- Identify if the feature affects compatibility with programs compiled by other
Fortran compilers, or if a given solution for flang could not be changed in
the future without breaking compatibility with programs previously compiled
with flang. It is not a goal to be 100% binary compatible with other
compilers outside of Fortran 77, but sources of incompatibility should be
known and justified. By binary compatibility, it is meant that F77 libraries
compiled with other Fortran compilers (at least gfortran) should link with
flang compiled code and vice-versa.
- Identify related features, or contexts that matter for the feature (e.g,
does being in an internal procedure, a module, a block… affect what should
happen?).
- Not everything has to be inlined code, delegating part of the work to the
Fortran runtime may be a solution. Identify the relevant Fortran runtime
API if any.
- For inlined code, consider what should happen when generating the FIR,
what should happen in the FIR transformation passes (FIR to FIR),
and what should happen when lowering the FIR to LLVM IR.
- For inlined ops, look at how the existing dialects can be reused.
If new FIR operations are required, justify their purpose.
- Look at the related representation in Semantics (e.g., is some information
from the parse tree, the Symbol or evaluate::Expr required? Are there tools
to query this information easily?).
Codebase Browser
llvm